Map the people who move your performance
Generated from
content/lms/coaching-science/06-communicate-inside-the-performance-team/01-map-everyone-who-can-affect-performance.md; edit the source file, not this page.
Source path: content/lms/coaching-science/06-communicate-inside-the-performance-team/01-map-everyone-who-can-affect-performance.md
Course: Coach drivers with evidence, not instinct
Module: Communicate inside the performance team
Estimated duration: 55 minutes
The skill
Your performance is not created only by what you do with your hands and feet once the car is rolling. The driving still matters most. Speed still matters. But the driver who treats performance as only a private cockpit problem misses a large part of what actually changes from session to session.
The skill in this lesson is to make a practical map of every person who can affect your performance, then use that map to protect the quality of your inputs, reduce avoidable pressure, and make better decisions during the event. This is not networking. It is not politics. It is performance awareness applied to the people around the car.
The reason this matters is simple: your skill does not usually change dramatically between one session and the next, yet your performance can move from clean and calm to rushed and messy. If the skill is still there, something else changed. It might be your state of mind. It might be the information you received. It might be who interrupted you, who loaded you with expectation, who gave you useful feedback, who changed the car, or who made the schedule clear enough for you to arrive settled instead of scattered. A performance-team map helps you see those causes instead of guessing.
For an intermediate driver, this is where you begin moving from driver as isolated performer to driver as complete performer. The complete driver is still fast, but speed has to be combined with preparation, discipline, communication, awareness, and the ability to work with people. The map is the tool that lets you do that deliberately.
This lesson stays narrow. It does not teach how to protect your pre-session preparation window in detail. It does not teach how to present coaching findings to engineers without contaminating setup work. It does not teach full team review structure. Those are sibling skills. Here, you are learning how to identify everyone who can move your performance and define what kind of influence each person has.
The principle: performance has causes, and people are part of those causes
Start with the idea that performance means how you performed, not just the result you achieved. A lap time, finishing position, or instructor comment is an output. It is useful, but it is not the whole performance. You need to know why the output happened.
That distinction changes the way you look at people. If you only look at results, people become background noise. If you look at performance causes, people become part of the system. Mechanics can affect whether you trust the car. Engineers can affect how clearly setup decisions are made. Team owners can affect pressure and priorities. Team members can affect timing, organization, and workload. Marketing and PR people can affect attention. Sponsors can affect expectation. Race series and track personnel can affect schedule, rules, access, flags, and event flow. Instructors and coaches can affect your focus. Car club members can affect the culture around your run group. Friends, fans, and family can affect your emotional load.
You do not map these people because they are all equally important. You map them because the driver who cannot name the influences on performance cannot manage them. The driver who can name them has a chance to decide what information to accept, what pressure to contain, what feedback to seek, and what needs to wait until after the driving is done.
The central question is this: who can change the quality of what reaches you before, during, and after performance?
That question keeps the map practical. You are not judging people. You are identifying pathways. A person affects your performance if they change the car, change your understanding, change your timing, change your mental state, change your physical readiness, change your obligations, or change your access to the track experience.
What goes on the map
Build the map around influence channels, not job titles alone. Job titles help you start, but the useful part is the effect each person has.
The first channel is car confidence. Anyone who touches, checks, fuels, torques, sets pressures, changes setup, or gives you information about the condition of the car can affect whether you drive with settled trust or guarded uncertainty. At a pro level this may be mechanics and engineers. At a club or HPDE level it may be you, a friend with a torque wrench, a shop that prepared the car, a tire vendor, a coach who notices a mechanical symptom, or a grid worker who spots a loose item before you roll.
The second channel is driving information. Instructors, coaches, faster reference drivers, data people, and sometimes experienced club members can affect what you work on next. This can be powerful, but it can also become noise if the input is poorly timed or unfocused. Quality output depends on quality input, so you need to know who improves your input and who simply adds more of it.
The third channel is pressure. Team owners, sponsors, friends, family members, fans, and even well-meaning paddock voices can spray expectation on you. That pressure may sound positive, but it can still change your state. A sponsor wants visibility. A friend wants to see a lap time. A family member wants you safe. A team owner wants a result. None of that is automatically bad. It becomes a performance problem when it reaches you at the wrong time or in a form you have not prepared for.
The fourth channel is schedule and environment. Race series staff, track personnel, club organizers, stewards, grid workers, instructors, and run-group leaders can affect what happens and when. They can change session timing, communicate event rules, define passing zones, manage incidents, or clarify where you need to be. You may not think of them as part of your performance team, but if their information changes your readiness, they belong on the map.
The fifth channel is opportunity and resources. Team owners, sponsors, marketing people, PR people, car club leaders, and event organizers can affect what chances you get, what constraints you carry, and what obligations surround the drive. A complete driver understands that racing includes business, engineering, advertising, marketing, and the ability to work with and motivate people. Even if you are not trying to become a professional, the same structure exists in smaller form. Your resources, relationships, and obligations still shape performance.
The sixth channel is emotional regulation. Coaches, instructors, friends, family, teammates, and rivals can either help you return to the process or drag you toward outcome obsession. The useful person is not always the most technically knowledgeable person. Sometimes the useful person is the one who helps you relax, lower effort, and return to the next controllable action.
The three-ring map
Draw your map in three rings. Keep it simple enough that you can actually use it during an event.
The inner ring is the performance core. These are the people whose inputs you may need during the driving day itself. Put yourself at the center. Around you, place the instructor or coach, the mechanic or person responsible for the car, the engineer or setup lead if one exists, the data or video helper if one exists, and the person who manages your schedule or logistics. In many HPDE weekends, several of these roles may be the same person. You may be driver, mechanic, data reviewer, and logistics manager all at once. That still counts. The map should show functions, not just names.
The middle ring is the operating environment. This includes track personnel, race series staff, car club organizers, grid and pit workers, registration, tech inspection, and anyone who can affect the event flow. They are not there to coach your corner entry, but they can affect whether you know the rules, arrive on time, understand the track day structure, and respond correctly to changes.
The outer ring is the pressure and opportunity circle. This includes team owners, sponsors, marketing and PR contacts, friends, fans, family, and people who care about the result or story around the drive. Some of them may be deeply supportive. Some may be financially important. Some may know very little about driving. What matters is that they can change your attention and expectation. You do not ignore them. You decide when and how they get access to you.
For each person or function, write four short notes: what they can change, when they usually affect you, what a good input from them looks like, and what a bad input from them feels like.
A good input might be timely, specific, and connected to your current performance objective. A bad input might be late, emotional, vague, result-focused, or aimed at a different problem than the one you are working on. The same person can produce both. The map is not a loyalty test. It is a performance filter.
How to fill it in without turning it into a blame chart
The map fails if you use it to explain away your own driving. The point is not to say the sponsor made you overdrive, the mechanic made you doubt the car, or the instructor made you miss the apex. The point is to identify inputs that may have changed your preparation, focus, or confidence so you can manage them better next time.
Use performance language, not blame language. Instead of writing that a person distracted you, write that their input arrived inside the final preparation window and shifted your focus from process to result. Instead of writing that a mechanic caused doubt, write that the car-status message was unclear before the session and you drove with reduced trust in brake feel. Instead of writing that a coach overloaded you, write that the feedback included more objectives than you could actively practice in one session.
This matters because intermediate drivers often become more aware before they become more consistent. When awareness improves, you may feel as if performance is getting worse because you are suddenly seeing errors, influences, and missed details that used to pass unnoticed. That is not failure. It is a sign that your input quality is improving. The map should make you more discerning, not more defensive.
The map also protects you from the magic-fix habit. Racers often look for the quick answer: the setup change, the hidden part, the one trick. Sometimes a technical change matters. But consistent winners are not built by chasing one magic piece. They are organized, disciplined, prepared, and attentive to basics. Mapping people is one of those basics. It helps you see whether the issue was the car, the driver, the timing, the information, the pressure, or a combination.
The influence categories to name
Use these categories as your working vocabulary.
Car-condition influence means the person affects whether the car is ready and whether you believe it is ready. This includes maintenance, tires, brakes, fuel, belts, loose objects, driver fit, and any symptom you need to understand before driving. The performance effect is confidence or doubt.
Setup influence means the person affects the decisions about how the car is adjusted. At an intermediate level, you should avoid mixing every driver comment into setup work without structure, but you still need to know who has authority here. The performance effect is whether setup conversations support the driving objective or pull you into mechanical guessing.
Technique influence means the person affects what you are trying to do as a driver. This includes coaches, instructors, reference drivers, video reviewers, and sometimes data analysts. The performance effect is clarity or overload.
Learning influence means the person affects your awareness and your ability to identify why a session went well or poorly. This can be a coach, but it can also be a teammate who asks the right question. The performance effect is whether you leave with a better understanding of causes.
Pressure influence means the person affects expectation. The performance effect may be tension, hurry, fear of disappointing someone, or the urge to prove something on the next lap. Pressure influence can also be positive when it helps you prepare with discipline and take the work seriously.
Resource influence means the person affects money, time, equipment, access, entry fees, sponsorship, promotion, or support. The performance effect is opportunity, constraint, or obligation.
Schedule influence means the person affects where you need to be and when. The performance effect is readiness or rush.
Culture influence means the person affects what behavior feels normal around you. In some paddocks, organized preparation and process talk are normal. In others, result talk and bravado are normal. The performance effect is whether your environment supports disciplined driving or pushes you toward noise.
How to use the map before the event
Before your next event, do a first draft from memory. Do not make it pretty. Put your name in the center and list every person or function that can affect your day.
Then mark each one as green, yellow, or red for timing risk. Green means their input can reach you at almost any time without hurting performance. Yellow means their input is useful, but only in the right window. Red means their input needs a boundary close to driving time.
A mechanic telling you that the car is ready may be green. A coach giving one clear session objective may be green. A sponsor asking about exposure might be yellow: important, but not while you are belting in. A family member wanting to process fear or excitement might be yellow or red depending on timing. A teammate pushing you to chase a lap time five minutes before grid may be red.
Next, mark each influence as technical, mental, physical, logistical, resource, or emotional. This keeps unlike inputs from getting mixed together. You do not want a technical question answered with emotional reassurance. You do not want a mental reset interrupted by a marketing obligation. You do not want a schedule problem disguised as a driving problem.
Finally, define one preferred channel for the important people. Who gives you car-ready status? Who gives you driving objectives? Who owns schedule changes? Who can interrupt you before a session? Who waits until after? You are not creating bureaucracy. You are reducing avoidable uncertainty.
How to use the map during the event
During the event, the map should be small enough to use in less than a minute.
After a session, ask three questions. What changed before that session? Who or what changed it? Did it help performance, hurt performance, or simply need better timing?
If you drove well, do not just celebrate the result. Identify the causes. Maybe the car-status message was clear, the coach gave one target, the grid timing was calm, and you were focused on process instead of outcome. That is information worth repeating.
If you drove poorly, do not rush to the most dramatic explanation. Look for causes. Did you receive too much feedback? Did you carry pressure from a person outside the car? Did you start late? Did you doubt the car? Did you chase a result instead of executing the process? Did you try to fix three skills at once? Did you fail to read the track detail that mattered that session? The map turns a bad session into usable evidence.
The best use of the map is not long analysis while the day is moving. It is one clear adjustment. Move one conversation later. Ask one person for a clearer car-status phrase. Limit one coaching objective. Redirect one result-focused comment. Clarify one schedule responsibility. Then drive the next session with less noise.
What good mapping feels like
Good mapping feels calm. You still have pressure. You still have people around you. You still have uncertainty. But fewer inputs arrive as surprises.
Good mapping also feels less effortful. When the right person handles the right input at the right time, you do not have to mentally carry every concern at once. You can relax into the driving task more often. That does not mean passive driving. It means you are not wasting effort on unmanaged noise.
A good map improves your ability to explain your own performance. You become better at saying why a session worked or did not work. You stop treating every good lap as mysterious and every bad lap as personal failure. You can separate driving skill, car behavior, preparation quality, information quality, pressure, and timing.
A good map also improves your leadership by example. Building a winning team starts with how you behave. If you are organized, disciplined, prepared, and clear about inputs, the people around you learn how to support you. If you are scattered, vague, and reactive, you train the group to become scattered with you.
Calibration cues
Use these cues to know whether your map is helping.
Your pre-session state becomes more consistent. You may still feel adrenaline, but you are less likely to arrive at the car carrying three unrelated conversations. You know who has permission to bring you last-minute information and what kind of information is worth interrupting you.
Your feedback loops get shorter and cleaner. After a session, you can identify one or two causes that shaped performance. You are not just saying the car was bad, the lap was good, or you felt off. You can connect the session to inputs.
Your coaching conversations become easier to act on. Instead of collecting many tips, you protect one active objective. This matches the larger learning principle that you should not overload yourself with every strategy at once. Choose the area with the most gain, practice it, then add more when the timing is right.
Your team communication becomes less emotional. Car issues go to car people. Technique issues go to technique people. Pressure gets named as pressure. Schedule questions go to the person who owns schedule. This keeps you from turning every problem into a cockpit emotion.
Your bad sessions become more useful. When awareness increases, you may notice more problems. That is not automatically regression. The cue is whether you can make more precise adjustments afterward.
Your good sessions become repeatable. A strong performance is more valuable when you can name the conditions that helped create it. That is the difference between luck and a strategy you can repeat.
Where this fits with the sibling skills
Once the map exists, you can use it with the other lessons in this module.
Protect the driver's preparation window tells you how to guard the final moments before performance. This lesson tells you who might need that boundary and why.
Share coaching findings without contaminating setup work tells you how to keep driver observations from becoming sloppy engineering claims. This lesson tells you who belongs in that information path.
Use team review like an athletic program tells you how to turn the team's learning into a repeatable review process. This lesson tells you whose inputs should be reviewed.
Do not try to solve all three sibling skills here. Your task in this lesson is only to build the map and start using it as a performance-awareness tool.
Worked example: the horsepower team and the complete driver
Imagine a team with a powerful sports car and high expectations. The car has horsepower. The team knows it. The people around the driver may naturally expect the car's pace to solve the problem. That is exactly where the driver needs a map.
Start with the inner ring. Who is responsible for the car being ready? Who gives the driver the final car-status message? Who decides whether a setup change is made? Who gives the driver the next driving objective? If those roles are not clear, the driver may climb in with power, but without confidence or focus.
Now map the pressure circle. A team owner may expect results because the equipment is strong. Sponsors or PR people may want attention. Team members may want proof that their work is being converted into lap time. None of these pressures is wrong. They become dangerous when the driver tries to satisfy all of them while also driving at the limit.
The performance move is to convert expectation into channels. The setup lead owns setup decisions. The coach owns the driving objective. The owner or sponsor conversation happens outside the preparation window. The driver owns the process in the car. That is how you keep a powerful package from becoming a pressure package.
The deeper lesson is that speed alone is not the whole driver. The complete driver combines speed with the other factors that let speed show up consistently. A person who can drive quickly but cannot manage inputs, pressure, preparation, and people will have more performance swings than a driver who treats the whole system as part of the job.
Worked example: the driver who can see others going quicker
Now imagine a driver who knows a section of track can be driven quicker because others are doing it. This is a classic intermediate-driver moment. You are no longer unaware. You can see the gap. But seeing the gap is not the same as knowing how to close it.
The people map helps prevent two common errors. The first error is to copy random advice from anyone nearby. One driver says brake later. Another says carry more midcorner speed. A third says the car needs setup. A friend says you just need commitment. Suddenly you have more input, but not better input.
The second error is to turn the gap into pressure. If you have friends, family, a team owner, or a sponsor watching, the fact that others are quicker may become a demand to prove something. That is not learning. That is a pressure loop.
Instead, use the map. Put the coach or instructor in the technique channel and ask for one objective for that section. Put the car person in the car-confidence channel and ask whether the car is behaving normally. Put the schedule or run-group information in the logistics channel so you know when you can safely work on the section again. Put spectators and result-focused voices outside the active learning window.
Now the same awareness becomes useful. You know there is more time in that section. You have a selected source for technique. You have avoided overloading yourself. You have contained pressure. That is how conscious incompetence turns into a training plan instead of frustration.
Worked example: reading the track without losing the people picture
Learning the track is not only memorizing which way the next corner goes. You need to understand surface, bumps, curbs, radius, camber, elevation, hillcrests, and straightaway length. Those details shape how you drive at the limit.
But notice how people still matter. Track personnel and club organizers tell you the event rules, passing zones, schedule, and safety changes. Instructors help you interpret what you feel. Coaches can help you choose which detail to study first. Other drivers may reveal that a section has more speed available, but they may not know how to explain why. Mechanics or car-prep people may help you decide whether a sensation is track surface, tire behavior, or a car problem.
A useful map keeps those sources separate. Track facts come from track and event authorities. Technique interpretation comes from your instructor or coach. Car confidence comes from the car person. Reference pace from other drivers is evidence, not instruction by itself.
That separation is important because track learning is already complex. If you blend every influence into one loud cloud, you will chase too many variables. If you map the people, you can use the right person for the right part of the learning problem.
Drill: the three-session influence map
Do this at your next HPDE, test day, or race weekend. Use three consecutive sessions. The drill is short enough to fit a real event and specific enough to build the skill.
Before session one, spend ten minutes building the first draft. Put yourself in the center. Add the inner ring, operating ring, and pressure ring. Mark the top five influences only. Do not map every person in the paddock yet. Choose the people or functions most likely to affect today's performance.
For each of the five, write one line: this person or function can change my performance by changing blank. Fill the blank with car confidence, technique focus, schedule, pressure, resource obligation, or emotional state.
After session one, spend five minutes updating the map. Do not analyze the whole session. Identify one input that helped and one input that hurt or arrived at the wrong time. Then choose one adjustment before session two.
Before session two, make the adjustment. It might be asking your coach for one objective only. It might be asking the car person for a clearer ready message. It might be telling a friend that you will talk after the session. It might be confirming schedule with the event organizer earlier.
After session two, spend five minutes asking whether the adjustment changed performance. Look for felt cues: calmer grid state, clearer objective, less doubt, fewer result thoughts, more ability to describe the session. If nothing changed, keep the observation and adjust again.
Before session three, make one more small change. Do not redesign your whole weekend. The success criterion is not a personal best lap. The success criterion is that after session three you can name at least three people or functions that affected your performance, describe the channel of influence for each, and define one timing or communication rule you will use next time.
This drill works because it trains awareness without overload. You practice the right skill in a limited dose, make notes on what changes, and build a program that is unique to you rather than copying someone else's paddock routine.
Common mistakes
The first mistake is mapping only official team members. At club and HPDE level, the people who affect you may not wear team shirts. A spouse, parent, friend, instructor, grid worker, shop technician, tire vendor, or car club organizer can affect your performance. Good looks like mapping functions and influences, not just formal roles.
The second mistake is treating the map as a blame sheet. If a conversation hurt your focus, the useful lesson is about timing and input quality. Good looks like writing a controllable adjustment, not assigning fault.
The third mistake is confusing result pressure with performance focus. A person asking for a lap time, podium, or proof can shift your attention away from the process. Good looks like translating outcome pressure into one controllable driving objective or moving the conversation outside the preparation window.
The fourth mistake is taking every piece of advice because it sounds experienced. More input is not automatically better input. Good looks like selecting the right person for the right channel and limiting active objectives.
The fifth mistake is ignoring track and event personnel. Drivers often think performance-team only means coach, mechanic, and engineer. But schedule, rules, flags, run-group structure, tech inspection, and event communication affect readiness. Good looks like treating operating information as part of preparation.
The sixth mistake is chasing the magic technical fix before mapping human and preparation causes. Sometimes the car needs work. But if you skip the basics of organization, discipline, and input control, you may misdiagnose the problem. Good looks like asking whether the issue is car, driver, information, timing, or pressure before choosing a fix.
The seventh mistake is overbuilding the map. If you try to manage every relationship perfectly, you create a new distraction. Good looks like starting with the five highest-impact influences and expanding only when the map becomes natural.
The eighth mistake is panicking when awareness reveals more problems. Increased awareness can feel like worse performance at first because you can finally see what used to be invisible. Good looks like using that awareness to make one precise adjustment at a time.
When the principle breaks down
This lesson can be misused. The map is not a substitute for driving skill. If you are missing basic technique, the people map will not magically make the car faster. It simply helps you protect the learning and performance conditions needed to improve.
The map also breaks down if you make it too rigid. Different weekends need different maps. Your program is unique to you. What helps one driver may not help another. Keep notes, notice changes, and adjust.
The map breaks down if you try to take on every strategy at once. Do not rebuild your whole communication system in a single weekend. Pick the influences that matter most right now. Add more later when the first rules feel natural.
Finally, the map breaks down if it becomes a way to avoid responsibility. People affect your performance, but you still drive the car. The mature driver can say both things at once: outside inputs mattered, and I am responsible for how I prepare, filter, respond, and perform.
The take-away
A driver who wants consistent performance has to understand causes. Some causes live inside the cockpit. Some live in the car. Some live in the track. Some live in the people surrounding the performance.
Map those people. Name how they affect you. Choose who gives which input, when they give it, and what good input looks like. Use the map lightly during the event and carefully after it. Over time, you will become less surprised by pressure, less overloaded by advice, more precise in review, and more consistent in the way you prepare to drive.
That is the real purpose of the map. It turns the paddock from unmanaged noise into a performance system you can understand and lead.
Worked example: the horsepower team and the complete driver
A team with a powerful Riley and Scott Ford-powered World Sports Car gives you a clean example because horsepower can hide weak performance structure. The car may be capable, yet the driver's day can still be shaped by mechanics, engineers, owners, sponsors, team members, and the driver's own mental state. The map starts by separating those influences. Car readiness belongs to the mechanical channel. Setup direction belongs to the setup channel. Driving focus belongs to the coach or instructor channel. Expectations from owners, sponsors, or team members belong to the pressure and opportunity channel. When those channels are clear, power becomes a resource instead of a demand. When they are blurred, the driver may spend the session trying to satisfy everyone instead of executing the driving task.
Worked example: the driver who sees others going quicker through a section
A driver who can see that a section of track is quicker than they are driving it has entered a useful but uncomfortable stage. The gap is visible, but the solution is not automatic. The wrong response is to collect advice from everyone nearby or turn the comparison into pressure. The mapped response is narrower. Ask the instructor or coach for one technique objective. Ask the car person whether the car is behaving normally if trust is part of the problem. Treat other drivers as evidence that speed is available, not as the whole instruction set. Keep friends, family, and result-focused voices outside the active learning window. The driver then has awareness, a selected input source, and a manageable next action.
Common mistakes and what good looks like
The common errors are predictable. One is mapping only official team members, when family, friends, car club members, instructors, track personnel, and sponsors can also affect performance. Good looks like mapping influence channels rather than job titles. Another is using the map as a blame tool. Good looks like identifying timing, clarity, and input quality so you can adjust them. Another is taking every piece of advice because it sounds experienced. Good looks like choosing the right source for the right problem. Another is chasing a technical fix before checking whether the issue was preparation, pressure, overload, or unclear information. Good looks like sorting causes before deciding the remedy. The last is overbuilding the map until it becomes another burden. Good looks like starting with the five highest-impact influences and expanding only when the process feels natural.
Drill: three-session influence map
Use three consecutive sessions. Before session one, spend ten minutes drawing yourself at the center and listing the five people or functions most likely to affect performance that day. For each, write the influence channel: car confidence, technique focus, schedule, pressure, resource obligation, or emotional state. After session one, spend five minutes naming one input that helped and one that hurt or arrived at the wrong time. Before session two, make one small adjustment to timing or communication. After session two, check whether the adjustment changed your state, clarity, or ability to explain the session. Before session three, make one more small adjustment. The success criterion is that after session three you can name at least three influences, describe how each affected performance, and define one rule you will use at the next event.
When this principle breaks down
The map stops helping when it becomes an excuse, a rigid social chart, or an overload project. It is not a replacement for driving skill, car preparation, track learning, or disciplined review. It is a way to improve the quality of the inputs around those things. If the map makes you more defensive, simplify it. If it makes you more aware but temporarily more critical of your own performance, keep going and make one adjustment at a time. If it creates too many tasks, reduce it to the highest-impact people and rebuild slowly.
Author Review
No quiz questions are attached to this lesson.
Sources
| # | Document | Chunk | Pages | Score | Collection |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Ultimate Speed Secrets - Ross Bentley | 0a7b123f-e40b-ee9d-96a9-122dd397d29d | 4 | 1 | uio_books_raw_v1 |
| 2 | Inner Speed Secrets - Ross Bentley | 12b38229-583d-d709-b629-b88b24921c14 | 164 | 1 | uio_books_raw_v1 |
| 3 | Ultimate Speed Secrets - Ross Bentley | cf3007c2-dd09-2b98-7892-86c3a5154dd5 | 521 | 1 | uio_books_raw_v1 |
| 4 | Inner Speed Secrets - Ross Bentley | 6922c3e5-4f39-f49c-4760-bf5e233bc987 | 20 | 1 | uio_books_raw_v1 |
| 5 | Inner Speed Secrets - Ross Bentley | 1f89d950-4532-a2f9-3f06-33a6a39f92d6 | 24 | 1 | uio_books_raw_v1 |
| 6 | Inner Speed Secrets - Ross Bentley | a4147ea3-257f-67b9-5fef-f56d4cfb427f | 134 | 1 | uio_books_raw_v1 |
| 7 | Inner Speed Secrets - Ross Bentley | f74de7b7-deb7-8b53-8851-548f3670c623 | 178 | 1 | uio_books_raw_v1 |
| 8 | Ultimate Speed Secrets - Ross Bentley | 3c9bb8da-4cf3-f696-2a1c-d08e142aa0d4 | 529 | 1 | uio_books_raw_v1 |
| 9 | Ultimate Speed Secrets - Ross Bentley | 4c99d7b1-8b24-7dbd-b21f-93757abf3896 | 608 | 1 | uio_books_raw_v1 |
| 10 | Inner Speed Secrets - Ross Bentley | 42cd9797-25c1-9bbb-d1f4-7aa50b893094 | 189 | 1 | uio_books_raw_v1 |
| 11 | Inner Speed Secrets - Ross Bentley | f1288da0-1a2f-156e-5422-ec1a0755ee7d | 188 | 1 | uio_books_raw_v1 |
| 12 | Inner Speed Secrets - Ross Bentley | 7a1e5fa9-cd1f-1a05-3258-5215475b490e | 128 | 1 | uio_books_raw_v1 |
| 13 | Inner Speed Secrets - Ross Bentley | f50a6a29-c5e3-adcb-e512-d7a2dd864e41 | 19 | 1 | uio_books_raw_v1 |
| 14 | Ultimate Speed Secrets - Ross Bentley | c179b4ca-b1cd-bbae-16ca-d15b1ecdfc12 | 11 | 1 | uio_books_raw_v1 |
| 15 | Inner Speed Secrets - Ross Bentley | fe584d30-db86-da65-71f3-a0c4caa9a4ae | 126 | 1 | uio_books_raw_v1 |
| 16 | Ultimate Speed Secrets - Ross Bentley | d64f3ac3-8ef8-0bfd-1ea5-ca5dc9d308c0 | 197 | 1 | uio_books_raw_v1 |
| 17 | Speed Secrets Professional Race Driving Techniques Ross Bentley | cd0d58f2-3710-f262-f875-923cd01ca4e3 | 5 | 1 | uio_books_raw_v1 |