Calibrate confidence like a performance variable
Generated from
content/lms/coaching-science/05-sustain-motivation-and-self-regulation/03-use-confidence-as-a-performance-variable.md; edit the source file, not this page.
Source path: content/lms/coaching-science/05-sustain-motivation-and-self-regulation/03-use-confidence-as-a-performance-variable.md
Course: Coach drivers with evidence, not instinct
Module: Sustain motivation and self-regulation
Estimated duration: 55 minutes
Principle: confidence is not a mood, it is an access variable
Confidence matters because your driving skill is not the only thing that changes your performance. Your actual skill does not jump wildly from one day to the next, yet your performance can. One session you feel precise, calm, and able to sense the car. The next session, with the same car and the same driver, you feel late, tight, impatient, or strangely disconnected. That gap is the reason to treat confidence as a performance variable. It affects how well you can access the skills you already have, how clearly you can sense the car, and how cleanly you can make decisions under pressure.
The mistake is thinking confidence means feeling brave. Bravery can make you enter faster without knowing why it worked. It can also make you hide from weak evidence because you do not want to admit uncertainty. Usable confidence is different. It is the state where you believe you can execute the next specific task and you stay aware enough to confirm whether the car is agreeing. If confidence sharpens awareness, relaxes effort, and helps you repeat a chosen skill, it is helping. If confidence makes you stop listening to the car, stop checking your line, or force speed into a place where your senses are behind, it has become noise.
For an intermediate driver, the job is not to be confident all the time. The job is to calibrate confidence to the task. A first session on cold tires, a new track, a new setup, a faster run group, or a corner entry you have not stabilized should not get the same confidence setting as a familiar section you can repeat cleanly. You can be committed without pretending certainty. You can be cautious without driving scared. The useful middle is evidence-based confidence: you know what you are trying to do, you know what cues prove it is working, and you know how to back out without drama if the evidence changes.
The mechanism: skill, belief, state, and input
Ross Bentley separates the mental side from vague attitude talk by pointing back to performance causes. If you understand what causes good and bad performance, you can build better performance strategies. In this lesson, confidence is one of those strategies. It is not the whole driver. It is not a substitute for practice. It is one controllable part of the mental environment that lets your trained skill show up more often.
Think of the driver as having four linked layers. First is installed skill: braking, vision, release timing, steering rate, throttle application, track usage, and all the habits built by practice. Second is belief: whether you genuinely accept that you can execute a specific behavior. Third is state: whether you are relaxed, aware, overloaded, tense, rushed, or focused. Fourth is sensory input: the information coming through vision, balance, feel, sound, g-force, vibration, pitch, and roll. Confidence lives mostly in the belief and state layers, but it changes the input layer too. When you are too uncertain, you may over-control and stop sensing. When you are falsely confident, you may under-listen and miss warnings. When confidence is calibrated, you use less effort and take in better information.
That is why Bentley's inner-speed list ties belief, imagery, awareness, focus, relaxation, and sensory input together. The list says your performance is shaped by what you feed your mind, that practice programs you, that mental imagery matters, that you should focus on what you want, that you should recall past successes, and that you can only do what you believe you can do. Those are not separate motivational slogans. For a driver, they form one mechanism: confidence is built from practiced evidence, rehearsed images, remembered success, and live sensory confirmation.
The mechanism also explains why false confidence breaks. If your confidence comes from outcome only, such as a lap time, a pass, or praise from the last session, it can evaporate the first time conditions change. If it comes from a repeatable process, it has a base. You know what you did with your brake release. You know how early your eyes moved. You know whether you used the full track without forcing the wheel. You know whether the car took a set instead of being surprised. That confidence can survive a slower lap because it is tied to causes, not just results.
The usable-confidence rule
Use this rule: raise confidence when it improves access to trained skill and lowers unnecessary effort; lower confidence when it starts replacing awareness.
That rule keeps confidence from becoming either therapy or ego. The purpose is performance. You are not trying to feel good for its own sake. You are trying to put yourself in the state where good driving is more available. In Bentley's terms, great drivers can use less effort to produce great performances, especially as competition or pressure increases. If adding confidence makes you grip harder, breathe shallower, charge the entry, and argue with the car, you have not increased usable confidence. You have increased intensity. Those are different variables.
Usable confidence has a recognizable feel. Your eyes are up. Your hands are quieter. Your brake release is deliberate rather than panicked. You are still listening to the car. You can describe what you are doing while staying committed. You are not asking the car for more just to prove something. You are choosing the next small performance step and checking the feedback.
Under-confidence has a different signature. You add steering after the car has already turned. You brake earlier than your plan but do not know whether you needed to. You hesitate at throttle pickup even when the car is pointed. You stare at the problem area instead of seeing through it. You work too hard and still feel late. Under-confidence narrows attention and makes the car feel busier because you are reacting to everything after it happens.
False confidence has its own signature. You decide the lap before the car gives you evidence. You enter the corner with speed but not with information. You skip the patient build-up because the last session felt good. You use less track than available and still call it fast because the entry felt dramatic. You cannot explain why the lap worked or why it failed. Bentley warns that a good driver should know why the result happened. That is the standard here. Confidence is useful only if you can connect it to causes.
The three confidence settings you actually use
For track work, use three working settings. They are not personality labels. They are operating states you can choose and adjust.
The first is discovery confidence. Use it when the task, grip level, car behavior, or environment is not yet known. You are not timid. You are sampling. Your objective is to improve sensory input, identify the primary variable, and avoid programming a bad habit. This is the right setting for a new track, a new alignment, a new tire, a wet session, traffic around unknown drivers, or the first laps after a mistake. Discovery confidence says: I can learn this if I stay aware and do not force a result before I have evidence.
The second is execution confidence. Use it when the task is known and the evidence has been stable enough to repeat. Your job is to run the programmed behavior with less conscious effort. This is where Bentley's automatic-pilot idea matters. You are not zoning out. You are letting a trained pattern run while attention stays broad. The point is to reduce the extra effort that gets layered on when you want a result too badly.
The third is expansion confidence. Use it when you have repeated the behavior and want to move the edge slightly. This is not a jump. It is a controlled increase in demand: a little later brake release, a cleaner minimum-speed carry, a more complete track-out, a less abrupt steering rate, or a more assertive throttle transition. Expansion confidence works only when you can name the cue that tells you the change is still inside control. If you cannot name the cue, you are guessing.
These settings keep you from driving the whole session with one emotional speed. Many drivers treat confidence like a switch. They are either confident or not. That is too crude for track driving. A single lap may require all three settings. You may use discovery confidence for a corner entry that has been inconsistent, execution confidence through a familiar braking zone, and expansion confidence on a track-out where you keep leaving unused pavement. The variable changes with the task.
Step one: set a primary objective before you judge confidence
Before you can decide how confident to be, you need to know what activity your confidence is serving. Bentley's decision-making material starts with the primary objective. That is the first step here. Do not begin with a vague desire to be faster or smoother. Pick the one driving behavior that deserves confidence work right now.
A good confidence objective is narrow enough to practice. It might be holding your eyes through the corner exit before turn-in. It might be releasing the brake without a second squeeze. It might be letting the car use the full track-out instead of pinching the exit. It might be entering an oval with clean habits instead of carrying road-course habits into a new environment. It might be relaxing your hands while keeping entry speed the same. The narrower the objective, the easier it is to calibrate confidence honestly.
Once the objective is named, ask three questions. What evidence says I can already do some version of this? What cue will tell me it is working during the session? What cue will tell me to back down or return to discovery mode? These questions stop confidence from floating around as a feeling. They attach it to evidence.
The evidence question should include past successes. Bentley's list specifically includes recalling the feelings of past successes. That does not mean pretending the future is guaranteed. It means using memory as a performance input. If you have successfully released the brake smoothly in another corner, remember the feel. If you have driven a wet skidpad or a lower-speed corner with clean hands, bring that sensation forward. The goal is to feed the mind with a usable pattern instead of letting uncertainty feed it with a problem image.
The cue question should be sensory, not only numerical. The bonded corpus supports speed sensing and traction sensing through vision, kinesthetic sense, hearing, g-forces, vibration, pitch, and roll. Use those. The lap timer can be reviewed later, but live confidence has to work through live senses. You are looking for the car taking a set, steering angle staying modest, brake release feeling progressive, the exit opening earlier, or the car using the track without a late correction.
Step two: build confidence from imagery before you need it
Mental imagery is not decoration. It is rehearsal. Bentley's inner-speed summary treats mental imagery as a way to program the mental mind-set and says that if you cannot do something in imagery, you will not do it physically. For this lesson, that becomes a practical pre-session requirement: do not ask your confidence to appear for the first time at turn-in.
Before the session, close your eyes for a short rehearsal of the specific objective. Keep it sensory. See where your vision goes. Feel the brake pressure change or the steering rate slow. Feel the car pitch, roll, and settle. Hear the engine note where it normally appears. Imagine the moment where you usually tighten up, then rehearse the relaxed version. The image should not be heroic. It should be clear enough that your body recognizes the job.
If the image is blurry, that is feedback. It may mean the objective is too broad. It may mean you do not yet understand the corner. It may mean you need discovery confidence rather than execution confidence. That is not failure. That is calibration. The problem would be to ignore the blurry image and drive as if the task were already programmed.
Imagery also protects you from negative phrasing. Bentley's list says you cannot not think about something and that you should focus on what you want. If your pre-session instruction is built around avoiding a mistake, your mind still has to represent the mistake. Replace that with the wanted behavior. Instead of centering the session on not overdriving the entry, center it on releasing the brake as the car accepts steering. Instead of centering it on not pinching the exit, center it on seeing and using the full track-out. Confidence grows faster around the desired action than around the feared error.
Step three: manage effort, because pressure often disguises itself as confidence
Many drivers respond to pressure by trying harder. The body gets tighter. The hands add speed to the steering. The brake foot becomes abrupt. The eyes drop toward the near pavement. The driver may call this commitment, but Bentley's pressure material says doing the wrong thing with more effort rarely produces a good performance. The more intense the competition, the better drivers relax and let the trained action happen.
That is why effort is one of your confidence gauges. If your confidence plan makes the lap feel like a fight, review it. True execution confidence often feels less dramatic, not more. The lap may be faster because the car is doing less arguing. Steering inputs are slower without giving away entry, midcorner, or exit speed. The line uses more of the track with fewer corrections. The driver is not passive; the driver is efficient.
This matters in HPDE as much as in racing. You may not have a competitor next to you, but pressure still arrives from instructors, friends, family, a faster car in your mirrors, the desire to justify an upgrade, or the feeling that you should be better by now. Bentley names external pressure from team owners, sponsors, friends, and family as part of the job for racers. For a track-day driver, the sources are different in scale, but the performance problem is the same: outside pressure can push you into inside tension. Confidence is useful when it lets you meet that pressure with less waste, not more force.
Use a simple in-car check. If you notice yourself trying to prove the lap, return to the objective and relax one physical channel. Loosen the hands, release the jaw, breathe, or soften the shoulders. Then ask whether the car gives you more information. If the answer is yes, confidence was being blocked by effort. If the answer is no, the objective may be too large or the conditions may need discovery mode.
Step four: make confidence answer to awareness
Confidence without awareness is just a story. Bentley's material repeatedly ties improvement to awareness: awareness of what causes performance, awareness in mental imagery, sensory input, and awareness-building questions. The performance driver does not simply assert confidence. The driver checks it against what is happening.
During a session, run a small awareness loop. Before the target section, name the action internally. During the section, feel for the cue. After the section, answer whether the cue appeared. If it did, keep the confidence setting. If it did not, adjust the task or return to discovery confidence. This loop is quiet enough to use at speed because it is not a lecture in your head. It is action, cue, answer.
For example, if the objective is slower steering without slower corner speed, the cue may be that the car rotates with one clean input and less midcorner correction. If you still need a second or third steering addition, the cue did not appear. Do not solve that by announcing confidence louder. Solve it by reviewing entry speed, vision, release timing, and line. Confidence should follow the evidence.
If the objective is using the full track, the cue is not whether the exit felt exciting. The cue is whether the outside tires arrive near the available edge without a late panic correction. Bentley's track-use material is blunt that unused track costs speed. But confidence should not turn that into a reckless command to run wide at any cost. Use the awareness loop: if the car naturally arrives at track-out because the line and release were right, confidence rises. If you have to throw the car there late, confidence should fall because the method is not yet clean.
Step five: debrief causes, not self-worth
After the session, do not ask whether you are a confident driver. That question is too vague and too personal. Ask what caused the performance. Bentley's early performance chapter frames the entire problem that way: performance ranges from crummy to great and varies for reasons we often do not understand. Your debrief should reduce that mystery.
Write the objective, the confidence setting, the evidence cue, and what happened. If the task improved, name why. If it failed, name why. If you cannot name why, that is your next learning target. This is where the lesson ties to Bentley's warning about knowing why you won or lost. A good driver can connect result to cause. Confidence becomes durable when you can explain its source.
Keep the debrief process-oriented. Bentley warns that expecting perfection is unrealistic and can reduce performance. Peaks and valleys are normal even when you follow good advice. That does not excuse sloppy review. It means one poor session should not destroy your confidence identity, and one good session should not inflate it beyond evidence. You are managing a variable, not passing judgment on yourself.
The most useful post-session note is often not the lap time. It is the moment where confidence changed. Did it rise after one clean repetition? Did it drop after traffic interrupted rhythm? Did it become false after you got one good exit and then overreached on the next lap? Did relaxation bring the car back to you? Those transitions teach you how your confidence behaves. Once you can see the pattern, you can intervene earlier next session.
Coaching yourself without stealing pressure from the related lessons
This module also includes lessons on pressure, effort, why, and ownership. Keep the boundaries clean. This lesson is about confidence as a performance variable. When pressure is the main issue, cross-reference the pressure-to-process-goals lesson. When motivation and effort are the main issue, cross-reference the why lessons. When the next step needs to belong to the driver, cross-reference the ownership lesson. Here, the specific skill is calibrating belief and state so they improve access to trained driving.
If you are coaching yourself, use instructor language that builds awareness rather than drama. Do not say that you are fearless, hopeless, fast, slow, brave, or broken. Say that the current objective is in discovery, execution, or expansion mode. Say what evidence would move it. Say what cue you will feel. That language is dry on purpose. It keeps the driver brain aimed at the task.
If you are helping another driver, avoid pumping them up without evidence. A driver who is under-confident needs a smaller successful repetition, a recalled success, a clearer image, or a simpler cue. A driver who is falsely confident needs awareness, not humiliation. Ask what they felt, what they saw, and why the car did what it did. If they cannot answer, lower the confidence setting and rebuild from sensory input.
What improvement feels like
Improvement in this skill feels like emotional range with discipline. You are still human. Confidence will rise and fall. The difference is that it no longer drags the whole session around. You notice the change, identify the cause, and select a response.
On track, improvement feels like more room in your attention. You can sense pitch, roll, vibration, and grip while still executing the plan. You can make a small correction without turning it into a story about your ability. You can enter a difficult phase of the corner with respect rather than fear. You can also admit when you are not ready to expand speed because the cues are not stable.
In your notes, improvement looks like better explanations. Early notes may say that you felt confident or not confident. Better notes say that confidence rose when the brake release cue appeared for three laps, fell when traffic interrupted imagery, or became false when a good exit made you rush the next entry. That is the shift from mood tracking to performance-variable tracking.
The highest-value sign is that your confidence becomes more portable. You can take it to a new task without pretending the new task is old. That is what happened in Bentley's road-racer-to-oval example: drivers with little oval experience could learn quickly when a coach helped them build the basics and right habits before bad habits formed. They did not need fake certainty. They needed a clean learning state, good habits, and confidence tied to the correct basics. That is the model for this lesson.
Worked example: road racers learning their first oval without bad habits
Bentley describes a pattern from coaching road racers who later became strong oval racers. They had road-course experience but little or no oval experience, so the coach could help them learn the basics and develop the right habits before old habits took over. For this lesson, the confidence lesson is not that ovals are easy or that road racers should feel instantly certain. The lesson is that confidence is easiest to build when it is attached to clean habits from the beginning.
Imagine you are that road racer entering an oval session for the first time. False confidence says that because you are quick on road courses, you should be quick here immediately. Under-confidence says that because the environment is unfamiliar, you should drive tense and late. Usable confidence chooses discovery mode. You trust that you can learn, but you do not pretend you already know. Your objective is to build the basic pattern correctly: vision, line, steering rate, throttle commitment, and traffic awareness in the oval environment.
The pre-session confidence setup is simple. You identify what carries over from your road-course skill, such as smooth hands and sensory input. You identify what does not carry over cleanly, such as road-course habits that may not suit the oval. Then you choose one evidence cue for the first run. The cue might be whether your steering input settles instead of being corrected in little pieces, or whether the car reaches the intended line without a last-second adjustment.
After the run, you do not ask whether you are an oval driver now. You ask which habit got installed. If the car accepted the line and your hands stayed relaxed, confidence can move toward execution mode for that piece. If you kept dragging road-course assumptions into the corner, confidence stays in discovery mode. That is not a downgrade. It is accurate calibration. You are protecting the learning process from both fear and ego.
Worked example: the Riley and Scott World Sports Car lesson on effort
A competitor in Bentley's professional racing introduction describes having a Riley and Scott Ford-powered World Sports Car with horsepower while Bentley had an effortless style that made him hard to beat. The useful point for this lesson is not the car specification by itself. It is the contrast between horsepower, effort, and performance. More force available does not automatically produce the better driver state. Effortless execution can beat strained effort because the driver is using skill cleanly.
Now translate that to your own track day. You may not be in a sports prototype, but you can still fall into the horsepower trap mentally. You add confidence by adding aggression. You brake later without a better release. You turn harder without a cleaner line. You ask the throttle to rescue a corner you did not prepare. From inside the helmet it feels committed. From outside, it often looks like wasted motion.
A better confidence setting is execution confidence with effort discipline. Pick a section where you already know the line. Your target is not to add drama. It is to hold speed while removing waste. Slow the steering input without making the corner slower. Relax your grip without becoming vague. Let the car work instead of making every phase a fight. If lap time improves, good. If the lap time is the same but the car feels calmer and your notes explain why, that is still useful evidence.
The calibration cue is whether confidence reduces unnecessary work. If your added confidence makes the car busier, it is probably false confidence. If your added confidence lets you drive the same speed with less physical and mental strain, it is becoming a performance variable you can trust.
Worked example: corner entry when the entry phase is the hard part
Bentley frames corner entry as more challenging than exit because setting speed and balance on the way into the turn is difficult. That makes entry a perfect place to misuse confidence. Many intermediate drivers use confidence to push the braking point or entry speed before they have stabilized the release and turn-in. The result is not true speed. It is a blind jump into the corner where the car has to sort out the driver's uncertainty.
Use a confidence ladder instead. In discovery mode, your objective is not later braking. It is to feel whether the car accepts the transition from braking to turning. Your evidence cue might be that you can release pressure smoothly while the steering begins, without a second brake jab and without a sudden steering add. If that cue is inconsistent, the confidence setting remains discovery even if one lap looked quick.
When the cue repeats, move to execution mode. Now you are allowed to trust the programmed action. You look through the corner, release the brake with the same timing, and avoid adding effort because the entry feels important. This is where confidence should make the action quieter. Your hands and feet do not need to shout.
Only after execution is repeatable do you use expansion confidence. The expansion might be carrying a small amount more speed or releasing the brake a touch later, but the cue must remain the same. If the car no longer takes a set, if your vision drops, or if you cannot explain what happened, the expansion was too large. Return to discovery. Confidence is adjusted by evidence, not by pride.
Common mistakes: what wrong looks like and what good looks like
Bravery mistaken for confidence. Wrong looks like entering faster because you want to feel committed, then being unable to explain why the corner worked or failed. It costs consistency and can program bad habits. Good looks like choosing a specific entry cue, raising speed only when the cue repeats, and being able to say what caused the result.
Outcome-only confidence. Wrong looks like feeling confident only after a fast lap, a pass, or praise, then losing the state as soon as traffic or conditions change. It costs stability across sessions. Good looks like confidence built from causes: vision, release timing, sensory input, track usage, and relaxed effort.
Trying harder under pressure. Wrong looks like tighter hands, sharper inputs, shallow breathing, and a driver who calls tension commitment. It costs feel. Good looks like using pressure as the signal to relax one physical channel and return attention to the primary objective.
Imagery without enough detail. Wrong looks like telling yourself you will do better while the mental picture of the task stays vague. It costs preparation because the body has not rehearsed the action. Good looks like a short sensory image: where the eyes go, how the brake releases, how the car settles, what the hands do, and what cue confirms success.
Confidence that ignores sensory input. Wrong looks like deciding the corner is fine before the car tells you. It costs safety margin and learning quality. Good looks like confidence that remains answerable to vision, kinesthetic feel, hearing, g-force, vibration, pitch, and roll.
Perfection demand. Wrong looks like treating one poor session as proof that you are failing or one good session as proof that the problem is solved. It costs emotional durability. Good looks like expecting peaks and valleys, then debriefing causes so confidence can be recalibrated next time.
Borrowed confidence. Wrong looks like needing an instructor, friend, or coach to tell you that you are fine before every attempt. It costs ownership. Good looks like using outside feedback to sharpen your own evidence standard, then leaving the session able to name the next confidence setting yourself.
Drill: the three-session confidence calibration ladder
Run this drill at your next event across three on-track sessions. Use one corner or one repeated task only. Do not spread the drill across the whole track. The count is three sessions, one objective, one confidence setting per run, and one written debrief after each session. The duration is five minutes of preparation before the session, the full on-track session for the target task, and five minutes of notes afterward.
Session one is discovery. Choose the task and write the primary objective before you get in the car. Pick one sensory cue that proves the task is working. During the session, do not chase expansion. You are sampling. Success means you can describe the cue after the session and identify at least one cause of success or failure.
Session two is execution. Keep the same objective and cue. Before the session, rehearse the task in mental imagery for two minutes. During the session, your job is to repeat the behavior with less unnecessary effort. Success means the cue appears on multiple laps without the car becoming busier and without you needing to add physical tension to make it happen.
Session three is expansion. Only run expansion if session two produced repeatable evidence. Choose one small increase in demand. It might be a slightly cleaner release, more complete track-out, or calmer steering at the same speed. Do not change three things at once. Success means the same cue remains present after the expansion and your post-session note can explain why the expansion worked. If the cue disappears, the drill still succeeds if you catch it, back down, and write the cause.
The pass-fail standard is not lap time. The standard is whether confidence became more accurate. At the end of three sessions you should know which tasks are still discovery, which are execution, and which are ready for expansion. You should also know what confidence feels like in your body when it is helping and what it feels like when it is turning into tension or false certainty.
When this principle breaks down
This principle breaks down when confidence is asked to replace missing skill. If the technique is not installed, confidence cannot manufacture it. Bentley's material treats practice as programming. Confidence helps you access and refine programming, but it does not eliminate the need to practice the right skills.
It also breaks down when the objective is too broad. Confidence in being faster is not actionable. Confidence in a specific brake release, vision habit, steering rate, or track-use decision is actionable. If you cannot name the task, you cannot calibrate the confidence.
It breaks down when the driver uses confidence to hide from feedback. The car always gets a vote. If the sensory input says the tires are not accepting the demand, if the line requires late corrections, or if the driver cannot explain the result, the correct move is not more confidence. The correct move is more awareness and a smaller step.
Finally, it breaks down when the driver expects a perfect upward line. Bentley's process material is clear that performance has peaks and valleys. Confidence management should make you more resilient through those cycles, not convince you that cycles will disappear. The practical goal is to return to the process faster after a bad lap, a confusing session, or a disappointing result.
Cross-references inside this module
Use the pressure lesson when the main problem is outside demand from other people, the clock, the run group, or the event. Use this confidence lesson when the main problem is how much belief and commitment to apply to a specific task.
Use the process-goal lesson when the driver needs to convert an outcome target into controllable behavior. Use this confidence lesson after the behavior is chosen, so the driver can decide whether that behavior belongs in discovery, execution, or expansion mode.
Use the driver-ownership lesson when the driver keeps waiting for someone else to assign the next step. Use this confidence lesson to help the driver own the evidence standard: what cue proves progress, what cue says back down, and what cause explains the result.
Author Review
No quiz questions are attached to this lesson.
Sources
| # | Document | Chunk | Pages | Score | Collection |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Inner Speed Secrets - Ross Bentley | 1f89d950-4532-a2f9-3f06-33a6a39f92d6 | 24 | 1 | uio_books_raw_v1 |
| 2 | Inner Speed Secrets - Ross Bentley | 6922c3e5-4f39-f49c-4760-bf5e233bc987 | 20 | 1 | uio_books_raw_v1 |
| 3 | Inner Speed Secrets - Ross Bentley | 42cd9797-25c1-9bbb-d1f4-7aa50b893094 | 189 | 1 | uio_books_raw_v1 |
| 4 | Inner Speed Secrets - Ross Bentley | a4147ea3-257f-67b9-5fef-f56d4cfb427f | 134 | 1 | uio_books_raw_v1 |
| 5 | Inner Speed Secrets - Ross Bentley | 12b38229-583d-d709-b629-b88b24921c14 | 164 | 1 | uio_books_raw_v1 |
| 6 | Ultimate Speed Secrets - Ross Bentley | 13d5ad27-440c-a690-f470-907b60dcfb22 | 476 | 1 | uio_books_raw_v1 |
| 7 | Inner Speed Secrets - Ross Bentley | 99f6bb64-a187-8d5d-eea4-a145add7b3f0 | 108 | 1 | uio_books_raw_v1 |
| 8 | Ultimate Speed Secrets - Ross Bentley | 7816dd86-ce80-1320-b6ed-b34e005cc98f | 16 | 1 | uio_books_raw_v1 |
| 9 | Speed Secrets Professional Race Driving Techniques Ross Bentley | cd0d58f2-3710-f262-f875-923cd01ca4e3 | 5 | 1 | uio_books_raw_v1 |
| 10 | Ultimate Speed Secrets - Ross Bentley | 536ffcb0-b4fd-90e0-b1a6-b29d29b9de0f | 217 | 1 | uio_books_raw_v1 |
| 11 | Ultimate Speed Secrets - Ross Bentley | 47f6de8d-9d56-5b6d-547a-f1e7bb92faaf | 152 | 1 | uio_books_raw_v1 |
| 12 | Ultimate Speed Secrets - Ross Bentley | 4400491c-451f-86fc-590c-1fa83983aef9 | 12 | 1 | uio_books_raw_v1 |
| 13 | Ultimate Speed Secrets - Ross Bentley | cf3007c2-dd09-cb98-7892-86c3a5154dd5 | 521 | 1 | uio_books_raw_v1 |