Adapt your style to the race in front of you
Generated from
content/lms/racecraft-ii-champion-mindset/05-signature-racing-style/03-adapting-style-to-situation.md; edit the source file, not this page.
Source path: content/lms/racecraft-ii-champion-mindset/05-signature-racing-style/03-adapting-style-to-situation.md
Course: Racecraft II — Champion Mindset
Module: Develop your signature racing style
Estimated duration: 60 minutes
Principle
Your signature style is not a script. It is the way you usually produce speed, pressure, and predictability. In a race, that style has to bend around the race in front of you. The driver who insists on being the same driver in every corner, every car, every lap, and every traffic situation eventually runs out of answers. The driver who keeps the useful core of their style and adjusts the timing, amount, and priority of the technique stays fast when the track, car, and people around them change.
That is the central rule of this lesson: keep your strengths, but choose the best compromise for this lap. Racing is a sequence of compromises. The ideal line can move because rubber builds up, oil appears, competitors occupy the road you wanted, the tires change, or the fuel load burns off. You do not win by having one pure personal style. You win by choosing the compromise that fits the car, track, tires, competitors, and race objective right now.
This lesson is not about inventing a new personality every session. It is also not the sibling skill of identifying your strongest traits, and it is not the sibling skill of making your intentions readable. Those matter, but the skill here is different. Here you are learning how to take a recognizable style and make it situational. You may be naturally assertive on entry, naturally patient on exit, naturally smooth with inputs, or naturally strong in traffic. Keep that. Then learn which dial to turn when the race asks for something else.
Why adaptability wins
Bentley frames adaptability as one of the differences between good and great race drivers. The idea is simple but demanding: the basic technique of driving a race car stays mostly the same, but the timing and amount of the technique change. A rear-drive purpose-built car on slicks and a front-drive production-based car on street tires still ask you to manage grip, line, braking, throttle, steering, and balance. What changes is how early you ask, how much you ask, and how long you wait for the car to answer.
That distinction keeps you from making two common intermediate mistakes. The first is treating adaptability as a total personality transplant. You jump into a different car or a different race situation and abandon everything that makes you good. The second is treating your style as sacred. You keep making the same entry, same pass timing, same throttle squeeze, or same defensive line when the car and race have clearly stopped rewarding it. Great adaptability sits between those mistakes. The technique remains yours, but the timing and amount become adjustable.
The track also demands adaptation. Every racetrack has its own personality, and even similar layouts can feel different. Track reading is not just remembering lefts and rights. You read surface, bumps, curbs, camber, elevation, corner radius, and straight length. Those details tell you whether your style should prioritize time in the corner, exit speed, early acceleration, corner-entry speed, or midcorner commitment.
The car adds another layer. A production-based car with more mass spread away from the center reacts more slowly to initial turn-in than a more centralized open-wheel car. If you carry an impatient, pointy, snap-turn style into that high-inertia car, you may miss the apex or over-slow while waiting for the car to rotate. The adaptation is not to become timid. The adaptation is to begin turn-in slightly earlier and make the steering input more progressive, so the car has time to take the set without forcing you to rescue the corner.
The race itself adds the hardest layer. When competitors are around you, fast solo laps are no longer the whole task. Racecraft takes precedence at times. You may have to give up a perfect line to defend, give up a preferred entry to attack, sacrifice corner speed for exit, or abandon an opening because the driver beside you is not predictable enough. Adaptability is the ability to choose those compromises without panic and without losing your underlying driving standard.
The mechanism: style becomes a set of dials
Think of your style as five dials, not one label. The first dial is line priority. You can bias toward minimum corner time, toward maximum exit speed, toward a defensive inside line, toward an outside setup for a repass, or toward a conservative line that leaves margin around unpredictable traffic. The second dial is input timing. You can brake earlier or later, release earlier or later, turn in earlier or later, and pick up throttle earlier or later depending on car response and corner priority. The third dial is input amount. You can ask more or less from the front tires, more or less rotation from brake release, and more or less acceleration while unwinding steering.
The fourth dial is racecraft posture. You can be patient, assertive, protective, attacking, or conserving, but the correct posture depends on the race. A start surrounded by fast starters is not the same as a midrace lap behind a driver who fades after a few quick laps. A predictable friend you can trust wheel to wheel is not the same as a driver who changes line abruptly. The fifth dial is mental effort. Under pressure, the answer is often less effort, not more. If you try harder at the wrong thing, you usually magnify the wrong thing. You want calm, energized, assertive execution rather than tense over-driving.
Those dials are only useful if you can reach them at speed. Conscious knowledge by itself is too slow in a race. Bentley is blunt about this: information at the conscious level has to become a subconscious program through mental imagery before you can access it efficiently under racing conditions. That is why adaptability must be practiced before the green flag. You cannot wait until another driver blocks the inside and then start inventing your first exit-pass response.
Pre-race adaptation: decide before you need the decision
Before a race, start with the grid. Where are you starting, who is around you, and what are those drivers like? Can you trust them side by side? Are they fast starters? Do they run a few fast laps and then fade? This is not paddock gossip. It is decision programming. If the driver outside you starts aggressively but fades, your best compromise may be to survive the first exchange and pressure later. If the driver ahead is predictable but slower on exit, your plan may be to show presence without forcing a low-percentage lunge, then build the pass from acceleration off the corner.
Next, choose a one-sentence race objective for the first phase. Examples: survive the start with outside awareness, attack exits behind the fading car, protect tires while staying within striking range, or pass only where the other driver has already shown predictability. The objective matters because a signature style without an objective becomes ego. You start proving that you are brave, smooth, late on the brakes, or good in traffic instead of doing what the race needs.
Then preplay the most likely situations. Bentley describes racing a Formula Ford competitor and then spending hours afterward discussing passing moves and alternatives. Without realizing it, they were practicing strategy and technique through visualization. The result was quick, aggressive, decisive passing in the actual races because the moves had already been rehearsed many times. That is the model. You do not visualize a vague perfect race. You visualize specific adaptation points: a driver spinning ahead, a driver moving inside to block, a start with a fast starter beside you, a corner where your car needs a more progressive turn-in, or a lap where your tires begin to change.
If you know the track well, time your mental lap. Bentley used a stopwatch and treated mental laps within a second of real laps as a sign that the visualization was accurate. For this lesson, use the stopwatch as an adaptability test. If your mental lap is only a clean solo lap, it is incomplete. Add traffic variations. Add a blocked inside. Add an exit-pass setup. Add a corner where the line moves because the race makes the ideal line unavailable. If the mental lap collapses when you add those situations, the real lap will probably feel rushed too.
First-lap adaptation: scan before you impose yourself
The opening lap tempts you to drive your identity. The late braker wants to prove it immediately. The smooth driver wants to protect rhythm immediately. The aggressive passer wants the first hole. The patient driver waits even when the race is handing them a clean opportunity. Adaptability starts by scanning before imposing your default.
Use your mirrors enough to know where everyone is around you. That does not mean stare backward. It means you should never be surprised by a car that has been in your mirrors for three corners. If you are about to adapt your line, defend, set up an exit, or leave room, you need a current map of the cars around you. A style that is fast but unaware is not adaptable. It is just fast until traffic exposes it.
On the first lap, read which promises are already being broken. Did the driver beside you brake earlier than expected? Did the car ahead protect the inside too early? Did the track surface feel lower grip than the warmup lap suggested? Did your own car rotate less with fuel onboard than it did later in practice? Each answer changes the compromise. The point is not to become reactive and scattered. The point is to update the plan before the race punishes yesterday's plan.
Corner adaptation: choose corner time or exit speed
In each corner, the basic performance question is still simple. You want to spend as little time in the corner as possible, and you want maximum speed out of the corner by accelerating early enough to maximize the next straight. Often, maximizing one means sacrificing the other. The trick is finding the perfect compromise.
Your signature style can distort that compromise. A driver who loves entry speed may keep trying to win every corner at turn-in, even when the next straight rewards a cleaner exit. A driver who loves early throttle may sacrifice too much entry speed in a corner where there is not enough straight afterward to pay it back. A driver who loves smoothness may avoid the assertive release needed to rotate the car. A driver who loves attack may keep the car loaded past the point where it can accelerate cleanly. Adaptation means asking what this corner pays for, not what your personality prefers.
For an intermediate racer, a useful corner question is: what am I buying with this compromise? If you slow a little more to get early throttle, you should be buying straightaway speed, pass setup, or tire preservation. If you carry more midcorner speed, you should be buying lap time in a corner whose exit does not dominate the following straight. If you take a defensive entry, you should be buying position without giving the other driver an easy exit repass. If you take a wider setup while being attacked, you should be buying acceleration and a better next straight, not just giving the inside away.
Car adaptation: change timing and amount, not the whole driver
Different cars expose rigid style quickly. Bentley's example of moving between a rear-wheel-drive purpose-built race car on slicks and a front-wheel-drive production-based car on street tires is not just a vehicle taxonomy point. It is a style test. If your signature is built on decisive rotation and early throttle in one car, the other may demand a different waiting period, a different release rate, and a different respect for which tires are doing the work.
The high moment-of-inertia example gives a concrete adjustment. In a car that takes longer to respond to initial turn-in, begin your turn-in slightly earlier and make the steering more progressive. That is not a slower style. It is a style that accounts for response delay. If you refuse the adaptation, you may end up over-slowing to get the car close to the apex. If you over-adapt, you may turn in so early and gently that the car never reaches useful commitment. The correct adjustment is early enough and progressive enough for the car, not early and lazy.
This is also where mental labels can mislead you. A driver says they are a momentum driver, a late braker, a smooth driver, or an aggressive racer. Those labels may describe strengths, but they are not car setup sheets. The car only responds to inputs, loads, grip, geometry, and timing. When the car changes, translate the label into actions. A smooth driver in a sluggish production car may still need a firmer initial brake set. An aggressive driver in a front-drive car may need to be patient with throttle because the same front tires are trying to turn and accelerate. The style survives, but the inputs change.
Competitor adaptation: trust changes the amount of risk
You will learn which competitors you can trust wheel to wheel. Predictable drivers do not suddenly make drastic line changes just because you are passing. They may move slightly to discourage the pass, which is expected, but they remain readable. Against that driver, your signature style can be expressed more fully. You can race closer, plan a side-by-side corner, and use a smaller margin because the other car's behavior is stable enough to predict.
Against an unpredictable driver, the same move may be foolish. This is not fear. It is adaptation. Racing has no universal hard script for every pass, and respect for competitors matters because the cars and consequences are real. The best compromise may be to pressure without overlap, force a mistake, set up exit speed, or wait for a cleaner straightaway. Your style should still be assertive, but assertive is not the same as aggressive. Assertive chooses a move that fits the evidence. Aggressive tries to make the evidence irrelevant.
One strong adaptation is the exit pass against a blocker. If a driver moves inside to prevent the pass, you do not have to keep ramming your preferred inside-entry identity against a closed door. You can set up to accelerate early and pass on corner exit. That may mean giving up the look into the corner, opening the radius, being disciplined about brake release, and prioritizing drive off. The pass is still an attack, but it changes the attack point from entry to exit.
Midrace adaptation: monitor the moving target
A race does not hold still. Tire condition changes. Fuel load changes. The track may change through rubber buildup or oil. Competitors may fade or become more desperate. Your car may change balance as the session develops. If your style does not update midrace, it becomes a memory of the first lap.
Build a midrace scan. First, ask what the car is now giving you. Is the front still taking the same turn-in? Is the rear still accepting throttle the same way? Are you having to add steering where earlier you were unwinding? Second, ask what the competitors are now giving you. Is the driver ahead fading after a few fast laps, as you predicted? Is the car behind strong only in one braking zone? Third, ask whether the original objective still fits. If the goal was tire preservation and the field has come back to you, it may be time to shift posture. If the goal was attack and the tires have gone away, you may need to protect exits and stop asking for midcorner heroics.
The key is to make one adaptation at a time. Do not change line, brake point, release rate, throttle timing, and racecraft posture all at once unless safety demands it. If the car is slow to rotate, adjust turn-in timing and steering progressiveness before also changing the whole corner priority. If the driver ahead blocks inside, adjust the pass construction before also changing your mental intensity. One clear adaptation teaches you. Five simultaneous adaptations hide the cause.
Mental adaptation: relax enough to choose
Under pressure, drivers often try to solve style rigidity with effort. They grip harder, brake with more emotional force, turn sharper, decide later, and call it racing hard. Bentley's mental-game material points the other way. Doing the wrong thing with more effort rarely creates a good performance. Great drivers often use less effort under more intense competition. That does not mean they care less. It means they stop wasting effort on tension and use attention for decisions.
Your target state is calm but energized, focused but aware, assertive but not reckless. You program that state before the race. See yourself dealing with adversity, choosing smart racing decisions, and focusing on performance rather than being consumed by the result. This matters because adaptability depends on attention width. If pressure narrows your mind to one preferred move, you stop reading. If relaxation becomes passivity, you stop attacking. The useful state is relaxed enough to see and committed enough to act.
The phrase adapt your personality to suit the situation appears in Bentley's summary list for inner performance. For this lesson, translate that into behavior. If you are normally patient but the race requires one decisive move before a pack forms, you become more assertive for that moment. If you are normally aggressive but the driver beside you has not earned trust, you become more patient without becoming weak. If you are normally smooth but the car needs an earlier progressive input, you adjust the timing without turning the wheel abruptly. Personality adaptation is not acting fake. It is choosing the version of yourself that can execute the best compromise.
Calibration cues: how you know it is working
The first cue is decision clarity. Before the corner or race situation, you can say what you are trying to buy. Exit speed. Track position. Tire preservation. Trust testing. Pressure without overlap. A pass on exit. A clean first lap. If you cannot name the purpose, you are probably driving habit, not adaptation.
The second cue is reduced surprise. You are checking mirrors often enough to know where the other cars are. You know which driver is likely to protect inside. You know which corner rewards exit and which one rewards minimum time in the corner. You know whether the car you are driving needs earlier, more progressive turn-in. You still encounter surprises, but fewer of them are self-created.
The third cue is a cleaner compromise signature. If you choose an exit-priority corner, the lap should feel like you gave up a little early and got paid later. If you choose a defensive line, the cost should be controlled and the exit should not be abandoned. If you adapt to a high-inertia car, the car should arrive closer to the apex without a late panic correction or excessive slowing. If you adapt to an unpredictable driver, the move may take longer, but you should have fewer emergency corrections.
The fourth cue is mental-lap accuracy. If your stopwatch mental laps are close to real laps when you include traffic and adaptation points, your program is becoming usable. If your mental lap is accurate only when it is a perfect solo run, your race program is incomplete. Add the blocked inside, the spinning car ahead, the fading driver, and the tire-change lap until those variations feel as rehearsed as the clean line.
The fifth cue is instructor language. A coach watching this skill improve would not only say you are faster. They would say you made the right race choice sooner, stopped forcing your favorite corner shape, used the other driver's behavior, and kept the car under you while changing the plan. They might also say you looked less busy. That is a good sign. Adaptability often looks calmer from outside because the decision happened before the correction.
Failure modes and recovery
The first failure mode is style worship. You keep driving the style you like because it has worked before. It may show up as late braking in corners that need exit, patient exits in traffic that requires a decisive overlap, or smooth inputs when the car needs an earlier set. The recovery is to ask what the race is paying for on this lap. If the answer is not your default, adjust one dial.
The second failure mode is adaptation panic. Something changes and you change everything. You brake earlier, turn earlier, alter the line, shift mental posture, and second-guess the pass all at once. The car feels worse because the driver has become inconsistent. The recovery is to name the single variable that changed. If it is car response, adjust timing and amount. If it is competitor behavior, adjust racecraft posture. If it is track condition, adjust grip expectation and corner priority.
The third failure mode is confusing assertive with aggressive. Assertive racing makes smart decisions decisively. Aggressive racing tries to use desire as evidence. Desire matters in race battles, but desire without situational reading becomes contact risk or lost time. The recovery is to define your move before you make it. If you cannot explain why this pass works against this driver in this corner with this car state, it is probably not assertive yet.
The fourth failure mode is over-respecting the car. After a few changes in balance or a switch to a different car, you become too cautious and call it adaptation. The car does need a different timing and amount, but it still needs to be driven. The recovery is to preserve commitment while changing the request. In the high-inertia production-car example, you do not creep into the corner. You start the turn slightly earlier and more progressively so the car can respond while speed remains useful.
The fifth failure mode is racing the memory of the field. You decided before the start that one driver fades, another blocks, and another is safe wheel to wheel. Then the race evolves and you stop checking. The recovery is to keep updating. Pre-race analysis gives you a first program, not a permanent verdict. Let the first laps confirm, refine, or cancel the assumptions.
Cross-references
Use this lesson after the strengths lesson because you need to know what your default is before you can adjust it. Use it with the intentions-readability lessons because adaptation should not make you erratic. Other drivers still need to understand what you are doing. A readable adapted move is far better than a surprising adapted move.
Connect it to track-learning work. If you cannot read surface, camber, corner radius, elevation, and straight length, you cannot know which compromise the corner wants. Connect it to mental imagery work. If you cannot do the adaptation in your mind, you are unlikely to reach it at speed. Connect it to passing and defending work. Adapting style becomes practical when another car removes the perfect line and asks you to create a different solution.
The final test
After a race, do not ask only whether your signature style looked strong. Ask whether it changed at the right moments. Where did you keep your strength? Where did you adjust timing or amount? Where did you choose exit over entry, patience over overlap, assertiveness over waiting, or progressive input over sharp input? Where did the race ask for a different compromise and you missed it?
A mature racer still has a recognizable style. Other drivers know what kind of pressure you bring. Your engineer or coach knows what you usually need from the car. You know the strengths you trust. But the mature racer is not trapped by that style. The style is the starting program. The race in front of you decides the final shape.
Worked example: Formula Ford pass rehearsal
Bentley's Formula Ford story is the cleanest model in the bond for this lesson. Two competitors fought hard on track because they trusted each other, then spent hours after races discussing passing moves, alternatives, and what they could have done if the situation had been different. They were not just telling stories. They were programming race adaptations.
The lesson is that your signature move becomes stronger when it has branches. Suppose your normal strength is an assertive braking-zone attack. In rehearsal, do not visualize only the perfect version where the other driver leaves the door open. Visualize the driver protecting inside. Visualize a car spinning ahead. Visualize having to abandon the entry and build an exit run. Visualize being the car on the outside with a driver you trust, then repeat the same corner with a driver you do not trust. Each branch teaches you what to keep and what to change.
On track, this turns into decisiveness. You do not spend three corners wondering whether you are still the late-brake driver today. You already know the branch. If the inside is open and the driver is predictable, you use the move. If the inside closes early, you switch to exit. If the other car is erratic, you pressure without forcing overlap. Your style is still assertive, but it is no longer single-path.
Worked example: From rear-drive slicks to a front-drive production car on street tires
The bonded corpus gives a direct car-adaptation contrast: a rear-wheel-drive purpose-built race car on slicks versus a front-wheel-drive production-based car on street tires. The core technique remains race-car technique, but the timing and amount change. That is exactly where intermediate drivers often lose their signature style.
If your signature has been built in the rear-drive slick car, you may expect a crisp response, a large grip envelope, and a throttle phase that helps define the exit. In the front-drive street-tire car, the available response and tire work are different. If you demand the same timing and amount, the car may not reward you. The answer is not to become a different driver. It is to translate the style. Your assertiveness may move from a sharp late input to a cleaner earlier setup. Your patience may move from waiting on rear traction to respecting the front tires' combined turning and driving workload. Your smoothness may become more important because the street tire gives you less margin for sloppy overlap.
The high moment-of-inertia example sharpens the point. In a production car with mass farther from the center, begin turn-in slightly earlier and make the steering more progressive. A rigid driver interprets the slower response as understeer and keeps forcing the wheel. An adaptable driver recognizes the response delay, changes timing and rate, and keeps enough speed that the corner still matters.
Worked example: The inside block that becomes an exit pass
One bonded situation describes a driver moving to the inside of a corner to block a pass, while you set up to accelerate early and pass on exit. This is the practical difference between style and adaptability. If your signature is entry attack, the block can feel like a personal rejection. You keep looking inside because that is where your identity lives. The race is telling you the entry is no longer the best compromise.
The adapted version starts earlier. As soon as the other driver protects inside, you stop measuring the move by whether you can win turn-in. You measure it by whether you can buy exit speed. You keep enough separation to see, release the brake in a way that lets the car take a useful arc, avoid pinching yourself behind the blocker, and prioritize throttle application that pays onto the straight. You may look less spectacular in the first half of the corner and much more dangerous in the second half.
The calibration is simple. If you gave up the inside but also gave up the exit, you did not adapt. You only surrendered. If you gave up the inside and arrived at track-out with a better run, you changed the fight to a place where the blocker had less protection. That is adaptable racecraft.
Common mistakes
The identity lock is the first mistake. You decide that you are a late braker, smooth driver, momentum driver, or aggressive racer, then drive the label instead of the situation. Good looks like translating the label into adjustable actions. Late braking might become earlier brake release for exit. Smoothness might become progressive but earlier turn-in. Aggression might become pressure without overlap until the other driver gives evidence.
The everything change is the second mistake. The car feels different or the race gets messy, so you change brake point, line, release, throttle, posture, and pass plan all together. Good looks like changing one dial first and checking whether it solved the actual problem.
The false patience mistake happens when a driver calls themselves adaptable but is really avoiding decisions. Good patience has a purpose: tire preservation, trust testing, exit setup, or waiting for a known fade. Bad patience is just fear with a nicer name.
The false aggression mistake happens when desire replaces reading. Bentley's material supports desire in race battles, but the same corpus also emphasizes smart decisions, relaxation, respect, and choosing compromises. Good aggression is assertive and evidence based. It has a reason, a timing, and a way out.
The solo-lap trap happens when your mental program contains only the clean ideal lap. Good looks like preplaying traffic, blocked lines, changed grip, first-lap density, and different competitor behaviors. If the first time you imagine the block is when it happens, you are late.
The no-update trap happens when your pre-race notes become permanent. Good looks like using grid and competitor analysis as a starting plan, then updating from what the race actually shows you.
The unreadable adaptation mistake happens when you vary style so abruptly that other drivers cannot predict you. Good adaptation still preserves readable intent. You can change the compromise without making random moves.
Drill: three-session style adaptation ladder
Run this over your next three race sessions, test sessions, or competitive simulations. The drill is not about being dramatic. It is about making one planned adaptation, observing it, and then programming it.
Session one is the baseline and naming session. Before going out, write your default style in one sentence and choose one corner or situation where that default may not be ideal. For ten laps or one full session, keep normal pace but ask after each lap what the corner was paying for: corner time, exit speed, position, tire conservation, or pressure. Success criterion: by the end of the session, you can name one place where your default was useful and one place where the race or car wanted a different compromise.
Session two is the one-dial session. Choose one adaptation only. It might be earlier progressive turn-in for a slower-responding car, exit priority when a driver blocks inside, or a calmer pressure posture behind an unpredictable competitor. Run at least five committed repetitions. Do not change three other things to make the result feel better. Success criterion: you can describe the exact dial changed, why it changed, and whether the car or race paid you back.
Session three is the imagery and execution session. Before driving, spend five minutes preplaying the chosen adaptation, including the failure branch. Time one mental lap if you know the circuit well. Then execute the adaptation when the situation appears. Afterward, write whether the real timing matched the mental timing. Success criterion: the adaptation feels familiar when it appears, not improvised in panic.
If you do not get the situation on track, the drill still counts if your mental branch is specific. The point is programming. The race will eventually give you the blocked inside, the changing tire, the unpredictable driver, or the different car response. When it does, you want the answer already loaded.
When this principle breaks down
Adaptability has limits. It does not excuse unsafe moves, unreadable driving, or ignoring event rules. The bond emphasizes that there are no universal hard-and-fast passing rules and that respect and courtesy matter. If a situation is not trustworthy, adaptation may mean waiting, pressuring, or choosing a safer construction instead of forcing your favorite move.
It also breaks down when the bond is too thin between idea and action. Conscious knowledge that has not been programmed is not available quickly enough at speed. If you learned a new adaptation in a debrief but have never visualized it or practiced it, treat it as a planned experiment, not a guaranteed race tool.
Finally, adaptability breaks down when it erases your strengths. The goal is not to become anonymous. Your strengths are the base program. The race asks you to tune it. Keep the core that makes you fast and readable, then change the compromise the situation actually demands.
Author Review
No quiz questions are attached to this lesson.
Sources
| # | Document | Chunk | Pages | Score | Collection |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Ultimate Speed Secrets - Ross Bentley | c21b9aec-19ec-713b-f58f-b40fe13cc069 | 376 | 1 | uio_books_raw_v1 |
| 2 | Ultimate Speed Secrets - Ross Bentley | 0d84a240-5464-95d7-020a-8b4dc976f923 | 446 | 1 | uio_books_raw_v1 |
| 3 | Ultimate Speed Secrets - Ross Bentley | 8a2f0ec2-4414-7ca9-e452-d0145ca30a74 | 448 | 1 | uio_books_raw_v1 |
| 4 | Ultimate Speed Secrets - Ross Bentley | 61cdf657-4bf4-74f1-79c6-58f4a2b9cc50 | 272 | 1 | uio_books_raw_v1 |
| 5 | Ultimate Speed Secrets - Ross Bentley | d9e68831-bd2e-fb43-8e6b-a89a77ab090c | 152 | 1 | uio_books_raw_v1 |
| 6 | Ultimate Speed Secrets - Ross Bentley | d64f3ac3-8ef8-0bfd-1ea5-ca5dc9d308c0 | 197 | 1 | uio_books_raw_v1 |
| 7 | Ultimate Speed Secrets - Ross Bentley | 6054ef2e-10b7-b9ee-1f7a-ab71e3b5d037 | 513 | 1 | uio_books_raw_v1 |
| 8 | Ultimate Speed Secrets - Ross Bentley | 7b584e87-cd53-ce7d-23d2-a2804465b5b5 | 324 | 1 | uio_books_raw_v1 |
| 9 | Ultimate Speed Secrets - Ross Bentley | ee4ddb39-cb81-0fa5-5322-b5aefed1e642 | 276 | 1 | uio_books_raw_v1 |
| 10 | Ultimate Speed Secrets - Ross Bentley | f351b8a9-9447-6a83-63f0-c517627d92c6 | 35 | 1 | uio_books_raw_v1 |
| 11 | Inner Speed Secrets - Ross Bentley | 12b38229-583d-d709-b629-b88b24921c14 | 164 | 1 | uio_books_raw_v1 |
| 12 | Inner Speed Secrets - Ross Bentley | 42cd9797-25c1-9bbb-d1f4-7aa50b893094 | 189 | 1 | uio_books_raw_v1 |
| 13 | Ultimate Speed Secrets - Ross Bentley | e1055530-7f29-fec0-25b8-da71c11dfd28 | 402 | 1 | uio_books_raw_v1 |
| 14 | Inner Speed Secrets - Ross Bentley | 1230073c-a147-2110-c1b7-63251bf601e0 | 49 | 1 | uio_books_raw_v1 |
| 15 | Ultimate Speed Secrets - Ross Bentley | e8114430-de62-15e1-e386-364c45765536 | 520 | 1 | uio_books_raw_v1 |
| 16 | Ultimate Speed Secrets - Ross Bentley | 47f6de8d-9d56-5b6d-547a-f1e7bb92faaf | 152 | 1 | uio_books_raw_v1 |
| 17 | Ultimate Speed Secrets - Ross Bentley | c179b4ca-b1cd-bbae-16ca-d15b1ecdfc12 | 11 | 1 | uio_books_raw_v1 |
| 18 | Inner Speed Secrets - Ross Bentley | 1f89d950-4532-a2f9-3f06-33a6a39f92d6 | 24 | 1 | uio_books_raw_v1 |